GreyIris
Grey Iris · Email program research
№ 001 · est. 2025 · LA

Most consultancies
guess.  We read.

We subscribe to your competitors' email programs through a dedicated address, wait for the welcome flows and triggered series to play out, and hand back a written report on what they're actually doing.

Email program researchfor the brandsyou should be borrowing from

The brands worth borrowing from aren't the ones you signed up for last week.

They're the ones whose welcome flows you stopped tracking after email three. Whose abandoned-cart cadence quietly outperforms yours. Whose sender posture passes every check yours fails.

We sign up. We wait. We read every message — twenty, thirty, sixty per program — and we score the work on several dimensions. The deliverable is a written report. That's the practice. There isn't a dashboard.

No. 02 · Method

How a study runs.

01 · Brand set

Brand set

You hand us a list of competitors and adjacents — eight to fifteen brands. We add three to five we'd expect a CRM lead in your category to already be reading. Each brand is then scanned across five sources: LinkedIn company detail, Instagram cadence, the Klaviyo Partner Directory, Google SERP triangulation, and Wayback Machine for prior BFCM cadence.

Day 01 session
02 · Subscribe & wait

Subscribe & wait

A dedicated address per brand — <brand>-<customer>@greyiris.ai — submits to each homepage popup through Apify Playwright with residential proxies. We capture trigger timing, field counts, headline copy verbatim, and segmentation steps. The welcome series, abandonment, and broadcast then play out the way a real subscriber would experience them.

Multi-source scanmulti-week observation window
03 · Read the posture

Read the posture

Per brand: popup behavior on render, headline copy verbatim, capture friction (single-field versus multi-field), welcome flow timing and density, segmentation steps. Plus the brand state around it — recent press, hiring posture, leadership transitions, social cadence, BFCM discounting cadence. The discipline is explicit about what we can't see from outside.

Per brandper dimension
04 · Deliverable & read-out

Deliverable & read-out

Per-brand entries — Verdict, Email state, Brand state, Lead-with angle, What we don't know, Bucket. A cross-brand layer surfacing system-level patterns and tilts for the next batch. A ninety-minute read-out with the CRM lead and whoever owns the calendar.

Web pagePDF report

The brief in one line

The deliverable is what we noticed. Not a dashboard, not a deck — a report.

— The brief in one line · No. 03

Sample observation

The Klaviyo popup fires auto-on-load, but a country/region modal layers on top and intercepts clicks on the email input. First-visit visitors fall back to the footer form. That's a list-growth leak that shows up on render, not in analytics.

A sample observation, lightly paraphrased.
No. 04 · Outcomes

What you do with it.

Per-brand entry.

Each brand gets its own page, structured the same way.

Verdict
Pursue, Worth a look, or Skip with reasons.
Email state
popup behavior, headline copy verbatim, capture friction, welcome flow timing.
Brand state
recent press, hiring posture, leadership transitions, social cadence.
Lead-with angle
direct pitch language, copy-paste-ready.
What we don't know
explicit limits of remote observation.
Bucket
actionable categorization across the set.

Cross-brand layer.

System-level patterns surfaced across the set — adoption gaps, capture-flow patterns, agency-attachment signals. Plus a tilt: where the next batch of brands should come from, given what this batch surfaced.

Web page & PDF.

Same content, two formats. The web page is the source — a private link, indexed and durable. The PDF is the same words typeset for filing.

Reserved study quote

This space is reserved for a study quote.

Asset gap

Send a brief.
Get a read.